• Category Archives Literature
  • Loki and Scansion

    Lughnasa                                                                                                            Harvest Moon

    “Someday you will be old enough to start reading fairy tales again.”  C.S. Lewis

    After a day with Loki and scansion, I got tired and was happy to have supper and watch Wire in the Blood with Kate.  Loki’s fascinating, an original bad jotun, and just can’t help making mischief, a festering ball of chaos.  He’ll make a great character once I figure out how to include him in the story.

    (Gullinbursti, the Golden Boar.  Part of the Loki saga)

    Scansion, on the other hand.  Oy vey!  I find recognizing meter, the stressed and unstressed syllables difficult.  I’ve never learned it and I need to now in order to finish my essay on Dickinson’s poem.  After locating some handy brief exercises, my head hurt.  So, I stopped.

    Tomorrow.

    The gong fu cha goes well.  I have a rhythm with it now and I produce six pots of tea out of a single batch of tea leaves.  The last two infusions, surprisingly, are the best.  At least so far.


  • I taste a liquor never brewed–

    Lughnasa                                                                   Harvest Moon

    Second draft of my essay for ModPo (Modern and Contemporary Poetry) finished.  It’s emily-dickinson-photo1here and shows what close reading (at least my still learning version) is.  The poem is by Emily Dickinson.

    I taste a liquor never brewed —
    From Tankards scooped in Pearl —
    Not all the Vats upon the Rhine
    Yield such an Alcohol!

    Inebriate of Air — am I —
    And Debauchee of Dew —
    Reeling — thro endless summer days —
    From inns of Molten Blue —

    When “Landlords” turn the drunken Bee
    Out of the Foxglove’s door —
    When Butterflies — renounce their “drams”
    I shall but drink the more!

    Till Seraphs swing their snowy Hats —
    And Saints — to windows run —
    To see the little Tippler
    Leaning against the — Sun —

    In your short essay, do a close reading of this poem. Use as a model the close readings done in the several filmed discussions of other poems by Dickinson.

    You may, for example, discuss at least briefly every line of the poem. Or you may choose what you consider to be key lines (or metaphors or terms) and explain each of them fully.

    Your essay will be evaluated according to how well you addresses the poem’s form, its use of (shifting) metaphor, and the extent to which its meaning is open. You should try to explain the story Dickinson tells here. For instance, you might say what happens to the speaker as the result of her inebriation? What does this have to do with the way the poem is written?

    My answer (so far, I have more work to do on the question of form and how the poem’s story relates to its form.)

    The poem explores a connoisseur’s palate for the ecstatic, probably the ecstasy of creation.fb-seek-those-who-fan-the-flames-rumiShe (Dickinson? Another I?) tastes this ecstasy as a liquor, not one found in package stores, but a liquor never brewed. She drinks it from a beer hall stein that has been filled not with liquid but with pearl or pearls, indicating, I suppose, that it’s used for finery stuff than Alcohol. Dickinson refers to wineries on the Germany river, the Rhine. This is the chief wine producing area of Germany now and was in the mid-nineteenth century, too. Even the famous Rhenish wine makers could not produce a liquor as fine as the poet drinks.

    She gets inebriated from breathing alone, an “Inebriate of Air.” It’s easy to imagine here in stanza 2 an early morning walk, breathing in the cooled air of the night and getting wet from the dew; perhaps she picks her feet up and begins a dance, a reeling. This dance becomes an ecstatic one, perhaps like the whirling Dervishes, that continues “thro endless summer days”.

    The fourth line of stanza 2 seems to me to read with the first line of stanza 3. The endless summer days—inns of Molten Blue (the gambreled sky of “Tell all the Truth but tell it Slant”?)—have guests. “Landlords” remove the drunken (ecstatic) bee from the Foxglove, could be the flower, could be the name of a pub or bar or inn. The Butterflies give up, renounce, their drams, their tots of liquor. Renouncing is a temperance flavored term or a religious one related to repentance. The Butterfly gives up their nectar willingly while the drunken Bee gets ejected.

    Neither ejection or renunciation works for the poet. Dickinson resolves to keep right on drinking. This reminds me of the Sufi poets for whom inebriation and intoxication were euphemisms for religious ecstasy though; I think the poet has a similar, but secular meaning in mind.

    The abstract and pantheistic ecstasy of the first three stanzas however, seems to curve seraphim__1acutely toward the explicitly religious when we come to Seraphs and Saints in the fourth. Seraphs were fiery angels, the burning ones, who flew round and round the celestial throne singing holy, holy, holy. Saints, in the context of New England circa nineteenth century probably referred to church goers, not Catholic saints, but church goers still. Both the burning ones and the ordinary Saints of the church stop their explicitly religious activity, the Seraphs “swinging their snow Hats” and the Saints to (church?) windows run. Drawn by voyeurism toward a pagan ecstasy, they see the poet, the little Tippler, the inebriate of air and debauchee of dew, leaning.

    Ah. Does she lean on the everlasting arms of Jesus or in the strong arms of the Father? No. We’ve never really left the abstract and pantheistic ecstasy of stanzas one through 3. No, she leans against the Sun, the burning one that exists within this realm and a metaphor for her creative ecstasy.


  • Dismiss what insults your soul

    Lughnasa                                                                         Harvest Moon

    I too am not a bit tamed, I too am untranslatable,

    I sound my barbaric yawp over the roofs of the world.

    Walt Whitman, Stanza 52, Song of Myself

     

    The journey into gong fu cha continues.  Today I bought some new teas at Teavana.  Still have made no tea in my yixing teapots.  I want to be ready to do it, able to be in the moment with it and there’s been too much going on.  Probably tomorrow, too, since I plan to take soil test samples from the orchard and the vegetable garden. Maybe Wednesday.

    Today has been a modern and contemporary poetry day, focusing on pre-modern poets, Emily Dickinson and Walt Whitman.  The class proceeds by reading a poem, then a video of the professor and six U. Penn students doing a collaborative close reading of it.  This is a very rich process.  I’ll post one of the videos here along with the poem, so you can see how much you can get from careful attention.

    This morning I sprayed brixblaster for the reproductive vegetables.  Maybe one, no more than two more.  No more drenches.

     


  • Surprise!

    Summer                                                                   Solstice Moon

    Several readers of my book have expressed surprise at its almost young adult focus and the fantasy elements.  I suppose this comes from two sources; that is,  people don’t know all of my interests or fascinations and there’s probably an expectation that my writing would be as cerebral as my public persona.

    (The Musician and the Hermit – Moritz von Schwind)

    Awhile back I read an interview with Phillip Pullman author of the fantasy trilogy, His Dark Materials.  In it he said he’d like to write serious, literary fare, but whatever subject matter comes to him, comes in the form of fantasy.  Same with me.  In a way I don’t think it’s surprising since the religious and philosophical and folk tale/fairy tale/folk lore world has been my constant companion since I came to a conscious awareness of myself.  That’s just the way the world makes sense to me, through the mythic and the archetypal.

    The life of the mind, learning and knowledge, also captivates me, and I find a lot of fun there, too, but the core for me, the essence is in the world of the imagination.  So when I sit down to write, well that’s the clothing that drapes itself over my stories.


  • chicken and waffles

    Beltane                                                                                    Solstice Moon

    Finished the HBO version of Mildred Pierce with Kate Winslet.  We saw the original movie a month or two ago and wanted to see this one, too.  What a shocker.  The HBO version has an almost entirely different last third.  The original, I imagine, took elements from the book and created a fine movie, one I liked a lot.  But, the HBO version, which I imagine is closer to the book, created a fine work, too.  Very, very different.  That’s one of the things I love about art, it can take the same subject matter and wring so many different perspectives from it.

     

    James Cain, author of the novel, Mildred Pierce, also wrote Double Indemnity and the Postman Only Rings Twice.


  • Does Great Literature Make Us Better?

    Beltane                                                                  Early Growth Moon

    Does Great Literature Make Us Better?  NYT article you can find here.

    I’ve read great literature off and on my whole life, starting probably with War and Peace as a sophomore or so in high school.  I’ve also read a lot of not great, but not bad either literature and have even written some myself.  And, yes, I’ve read some distinctly bad literature, but not on purpose.

    A formative experience in my reading life occurred in my sophomore year of college when I took a required English literature class.  Before taking the class I had given serious thought to majoring in English.  Then I had whatever his name was for a professor.  He told me what the books I read in his class meant.  He also claimed, proudly, to read Time Magazine from cover to cover each week as a form of discipline.  (That would have been discipline for me, too.  Punishment.)

    Whether he represented English literature professors or not I don’t know, and I suspect now that he probably didn’t, but at the time I decided I could do the work of an English major without putting up with anymore of that kind of instruction.  I would read.  And I did and I have.

    (Greuter Seven liberal arts  1605)

    [That’s how I ended up in Anthropology and Philosophy for a double major.  Though I did have almost enough credits for a geography minor and a theater minor.  The theater credits were almost all in the history of theater, which I found fascinating.  The geography business came about because I was interested in the Soviet Union and, to a lesser exent then, China.]

    Has reading Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Singer, Hesse, Austen, Mann, Kafka and all those others made me a better person?  Hell, I don’t know.  In the article quoted above I think the writer refers to an argument about liberal arts in general; that is, that studying the liberal arts makes one more able to think critically in a complex world and, therefore, to act with a higher level of moral sensitivity.

    That the liberal arts and reading great literature teaches critical thinking is, I think, established.  They do this by the comparative method, familiar to students of anthropology and philosophy and literature and theology.  How does it work?  In the words of blue book essay tests since time immemorial, you compare and contrast.  By comparing this culture to that one, or this writer to that one, or this book to that one, or this period of philosophy to that one or this theological perspective to that one, a sensitivity to the variations in argumentation, in problem solving, in abstract analysis becomes second nature.

    This sensitivity to the variations does not, I think, breed a more moral person, but it does produce a more humble one, a person who, if they’ve paid attention, knows that this solution or that one is not necessarily true or right, but, rather is most likely one among many.  This humility does not cancel out conviction or commitment, rather it positions both in the larger reality of human difference.

    So, in the end, I don’t believe the case for reading great literature is to be made in its efficacy or lack of it in creating moral sensitivity, but rather in great literature’s broadening of our horizon and in the concomitant deflation of our sense of moral righteousness, perhaps, oddly, the very opposite of creating a more moral person.

     


  • Root and Branch

    Beltane                                                                       Early Growth Moon

    Water and heat.  Sun and soil.  Roots, stalks and leaves.  There you have it.  And we’ve got it this week.  Rain, rain, rain.  Then some heat.  Seeds germinating, bursting up, ready to transubstantiate.  All for the great cycle of life, churning, moving, flowing, surging.  I can feel it, smell it at this time of year.  And I love it.

    Just finished Dan Brown’s Inferno.  If you read the NYT review, you will discover that Dan has a mundane talent for words.  And that’s true.  The reviews I read didn’t add, but they should, that he throws in potted art history and architectural criticism, not to mention some odd rant on transhumanism.  Yet, did you notice, I finished it.  Why?  Well, reading like a writer, this guy knows how to plot.  He can make you wonder what’s coming next.

    He pulls off one big twist in this novel and it’s a dandy, but it feels very contrived even though he sucked me in completely with it.  That’s sort of the thing he’s got going, you can see the holes in his works, where I wondered were the editors who could have easily fixed much of this, but you pass them by to find out what happens next.  That’s story telling and it’s the true game which every writer plays.

    (Lucifer, trapped in the 9th circle. Canto 34, lines 20–21  Gustave Dore)

    Hey, listen!  Have I got something to tell you.  Clumsy sentences, wooden metaphors, filler pages, yes, they matter, but in the end not as much if you keep me interested.

    coda next morning:  I will buy and read your book if you can entertain me.  Whether I remember it or learn from it and, most important, whether I will return to it, however, depends on those skills Dan Brown seems to shunt aside as unnecessary.  No, I won’t be re-reading any of his work.


  • Like Attending My Own Funeral

    Beltane                                                                                 Early Growth Moon

    Sort of like attending my own funeral.   All day today notes have come in from docent classmates responding to my resignation from the program which I sent out in a private newsletter we have just for our class.  Mini-eulogies.  It’s interesting because it is often this kind of stuff that we don’t feel liberated to say until a relationship has been severed, either by death or by saying a permanent good-bye.  Would probably be good if we could learn to say these things more often.  Thanks to all of you who’ve written.

    The revision process has legs now, new material being written, older material rewritten.  I’m back in the fictive dream of Missing, inhabiting the two worlds and living with their characters, their flora and fauna.  It’s a homecoming of sorts.  Though I’ve been into for a month or so in terms of writing, I’ve been at it for longer with reading material from beta readers, re-reading the text myself and plotting a strategy for this third revision.

    Put another 5 verses of Book I into English today, making better and more notes about items for the commentary.  I really want this commentary to synch with Perseus, but I also want it to live on smartphones and tablet computers.  I want it to be the commentary for this media age.

    Greg and I talked last Friday about how this kind of reading necessarily becomes close reading, a sort of reading often promoted, but less often executed.   You might call it slow reading.

    Speed reading has its place, I guess, and I certainly tried to put it to use, having taken the Evelyn Woods program when I started college in 1965.  This program preaches adapting your speed to the kind of reading you’re doing.  So, say Time magazine or Sports Illustrated (of equal depth most of the time) might take your quickest scan, finger moving down the center of the page with some speed.  Philosophy on the other hand would go much more slowly, say 150 words a minute.  The idea preached by speed readers is that the quicker you go the more your mind concentrates on reading alone, not wandering away.  Maybe.

    What I do know is that if you want to learn, slowing down to the pace translation forces, often word by word, looking up the word, its grammatical forms, figuring out how they fit together before the sense of the sentence begins to emerge, then you read slowly.  Letting the mind wander when it will, tracking words down through paths already in the mind, making connections, asking questions, probing the text.  This is how you make a work your own.

    So, I’m for slow food, slow travel, slow reading, slow thinking.

     


  • At It

    Spring                                                             Bloodroot Moon

    Still reading through Missing, making notes, trying to integrate beta reader observations and questions.  It’s slower right now because I’m also trying to integrate lessons about description and pacing from Robert Jordan’s amazing The Eye of the World.

    The general plan for revision III has begun to take shape.  Some shifting of certain narrative threads to book II or to a book of their own, expanding the ending, putting the climax in earlier, making descriptions beefier, more lush and adding narrative in sections where what I wrote was, as Judy observed, outline like.

    How long will it take?  I have no idea.  As soon as I can finish it, but just how long that is, I don’t know.  Why?  Partly the removal of certain narrative lines will create disruption as well as clarification.  Partly because the climax I have doesn’t satisfy me and I’m not clear what it should be.  Partly because adding descriptive material is a whole manuscript task and a personal style changer, too, since I tend to be spare.  There will be a learning curve.

    Closing in on the last few verses of the Jason and Medea early story.  When I’m done with it, before Friday, and have checked and revised my work, also before Friday, I’m ready to go to Book I and begin the work I first decided I wanted to do back in 2008 or 2009.  That’s exciting.

    It’s exciting for more than the obvious reason; that is, that I can now do it.  It’s exciting in addition because it will feed a new work, one I will not start until all three of the Tailte novels are finished; but, a work I hope will utilize all I’m learning about writing and about mythology and Latin and Ovid and Rome.  Working title:  Changes.

     


  • The Dark Edge of Fiction

    Spring                                                                               Bloodroot Moon

    “As our circle of knowledge expands, so does the circumference of darkness surrounding it.”  A. Einstein

    In one part of my life I chomp down on facts, ideas, connections, linkages.  Known and knowable things.  Stuffing them in, sometimes sideways, cramming them into the remaining nooks and crannies, or, rather growing dendrites and increasing those neuronal connections.  The Connectome.  My Connectome.

    But.  When I write, instead of pouncing on the learning.  Trying to take it out for a spin in, say, an essay or a short non-fiction book.  I don’t.  My fiction comes from the darkness, from the circumference surrounding the knowledge, the place where the knowledge cannot go and would be of little help.

    Fiction has its coherence with reality in spite of the definition, say on a continuum from realism to fantasy.  Even in fantasy, even one based on a world not this one, the characters are recognizable, they have to be, otherwise the fiction would not be communication but gibberish.

    So, yes, there is that leash, but it’s a long one.  Often in fantasy long enough to lie useless on the sidewalk next to an orange lawn under an azure sun.  Oh, if you wanted, you could pick it up and follow it back to a Dairy Queen and ocean-going shipping, but why would you want to?  I mean, the action is at the other end of the leash.  That’s where I’d want to go.

    And that’s the edge of fiction that lies alongside, shares a border with, the darkness.  Out there the leash no longer matters.  Except as a reminder that we’re all in this together somehow.  Somehow.