Lughnasa Waxing Artemis Moon
On mosques and sites and sealing wax.
Are we fighting with Islam or with terrorists who use Islam as a cover? You know the answer. What message do you give to the ummah, the worldwide Islamic community, if you deny a mosque near a site where the terrorists who use Islam as a cover delivered a powerful blow? That you don’t know the difference.
Or. What message do you give if you allow the mosque? That you know the difference. Which strategy has better long term potential both within the US and outside it. Again, you know the answer.
When demagogues pander to the lowest common denominator on volatile matters like this, it corresponds to yelling fire in a crowded theatre. This is intentional inflammation of an issue not because you believe the matter is substantive, but because you know it will rouse the sleeping dogs.
There is, in fact, no issue here. Let me say again. No issue. The first amendment, even earlier than the holy and blessed 2nd, protects freedom of religion and freedom of association and freedom of speech. Which of these constitutional, black letter law freedoms do you wish to ignore? Where’s a strict constructionist when we need one?
Let them build. Let them demonstrate that the United States can discriminate between friend and foe. Let them demonstrate that the constitutional protections that make us a desirable place for immigrants from around the globe are still in place.
Let us demonstrate that the coward and the bully will not, should not win this kind of rhetorical battle.
Let them build.
Here’s the contrary argument from the New York Daily News:
“…But what about common sense and decency? If Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf had either, he and his group would reconsider the location out of respect for the hordes of Americans, many of them 9/11 family members themselves, who think that this idea just plain stinks. And if it weren’t for political correctness and our decidedly 21st century paranoia over offending Islam, our national leaders would proudly echo those sentiments.
Enough is enough. The speechifying and pontificating on the mosque’s constitutionality are a distraction and a straw man. No one in serious circles who opposes the mosque at Ground Zero is suggesting it should be made illegal to build a Muslim house of worship near the site of the 9/11 attacks.
What they’re trying to say, and largely to plugged ears on the left, is that having the right doesn’t make it right.”
