Category Archives: US History

Almost the 4th

Summer                                                          Most Heat Moon

The last few days have been cool, more late September than early July. Kate worked 2011 06 26_0933early spring 2011outside a long time yesterday, clearing weeds out of the third tier of our garden and it looks great. It’s pleasant to work outside when it’s cool, much less so when it’s hot. I sprayed the orchard and the garden, mounded soil around the leeks to blanch them and moved much of what Kate had thrown over the fence.

Jon and Ruthie are on the road right now, headed toward Kansas City (on purpose), then north to Andover. It will be fun to have them here.

Jon’s going to put in a new deck for us. This was arranged long ago, but it will be good for selling the house.

These nights leading up to the 4th of July and the 4th itself are a problem for our thunderphobic (astraphobic) dogs. They inspire those neighbors who like to shoot off fireworks, one batch (not the usual suspects) who set them off around 10 p.m. each night lately. That’s just enough to launch Gertie (our German shorthair) out of her crate.

Click on the poster for its full effect.

 

 

Be the Change or Change the System?

Summer                                                                  Most Heat Moon

1968. Martin dies. Bobby dies. The Chicago riots at the Democratic National Convention. Local boy Hubert challenges Richard (enemy’s list) Nixon and Nixon wins with a knockout 301 electoral votes. This brought Spiro (nattering nabobs of negativism) Agnew into office, too. Oh, what a time it was.

On the outside, including certain rioters at the Chicago convention who would become famous as the Chicago 7, was a massive, incoherent largely college student uprising known as “the movement.” In those days there was a split within the movement about whether to engage the political system, the establishment (a term borrowed from American thinker Ralph Waldo Emerson), through protests and (usually) alternative candidates for election like Dick Gregory, or, to drop out.

Tune in, turn on, drop out was a favorite mantra of those who contended the establishment was too corrupt to change and instead must be ignored while a new culture was built. This was the time of communes and the back to the land movement. The split within the movement identified hippies who wanted to live together in a participatory democracy, often rural, but not always, and radicals, who thought protest and work in congress could bring an end to the Vietnam War and usher in an era of peaceful, socialist-style politics.

These two groups, the hippies and the radicals were, within the movement itself, seen as opposite, if not opposing camps. At its core it was a political equivalent of the debate within Western Christendom between quietist monastics who retired from the world into a life of prayer and contemplation and the engaged church which tried to influence the lives of people in their worldly home.

Today the camps divide less obviously but they cluster around, on the one hand, folk who might have a “Be the change you want to see in the world.” bumper sticker, and on the other, those who have a 99% button or a Sierra Club hiker on their car.

I never understood the conflict myself. I became a committed back to the lander, purchasing a farm in northern Minnesota while remaining, at the same time, committed to political action. It still seems to me that living the change and acting politically go together. They are points on a continuum of belief turned toward action, not dialectical opposites.

 

World War?

Beltane                                                                      Emergence Moon

Over breakfast this morning we got into an interesting conversation, first about climate change, then about China.  Climate change sentiments varied around this table of guys who mostly agree with each other.

China raised the most controversy. Mark Odegard feels a war with China, a world war, is inevitable. I don’t. I feel China is not historically expansionist and very far behind us in military spending, military preparedness and military competence. Doing much harm to the U.S. would also hurt the Chinese investments in our economy. I forgot to mention this morning that since both China and the U.S. have nuclear weapons the likelihood of a full-fledged war is much less.

Mark sees the region as rent by old wounds, like the Japanese invasion and rape of Nanjing, the occupation of Tibet and, he didn’t mention, but could have the Islamist Uighur’s in the West. He also sees Japan and North Korea, especially the latter, as prone to irrational decisions and likely to precipitate a full-scale war through some hot-headed action.

Certainly history is on the side of the one who foresees military action. As a species, we are violence prone and given the anarchic nature of politics at the nation-state level that tendency has often led to military rather than diplomatic solutions. There are, too, no end of possible trigger points, the major among them being China and Japan’s insatiable appetite for oil, which must come from largely from the Middle East. That makes the South China Sea a potential flash point and China has repeatedly engaged in provocative actions there.

It is my sense though that Chinese development benefits much, much more from peace and diplomacy than it would from a war fought across the vastness of the Pacific and especially against an enemy like the U.S. which already has significant military presence in its near ocean. A war would present the U.S. with major supply chain issues, of course, but we have shown ourselves willing to overcome that distance once and I imagine we could again, certainly much faster than China could project naval and armed forces power in the other direction.

History is the judge in this debate and we may not live long enough to see the question answered definitively.

 

Off the Bench. Again.

Beltane                                                             Emergence Moon

Met Becky Rothmeier Loewen of America Votes at the MIA today. We talked politics, what the Sierra Club wanted of America Votes and what I wanted. It was fun. Both of us shared an occasional desire to set politics aside, but as she said, “When you know you have the power to do something…” Yes, that’s the rub all right. I sit on the sidelines, then, “Oh, come on.” returns to my vocabulary and I find myself pushed and pulled right back.

From a political junkies perspective America Votes is a candy store. Great data about all the races (at least in Minnesota), in depth. People to talk to about the minutiae of segmenting demographics, messaging on mailers, which races can be swayed. Most folks don’t care about these things, but there is a coterie of folks for whom these kind of matters are their Daily Racing News. And I’m one of them.

As I said after attending the last meeting of America Votes, it’s good to see the young guns out there, eager for the next campaign. In a democracy it is apathy and indifference that spell certain defeat no matter what your political perspective. This group of folks are necessary for the full functionality of an often torpid electorate.

At 67 I realize that I’m not likely to stay on the sidelines for long, no matter where I live. It hasn’t happened yet. As I told Becky the first live election returns I recall caring about were the results of Adlai Stevenson versus Dwight Eisenhower. Those my dad and I saw, until 3 in the morning in black and white on a still uncommon consumer product called television. That was 1952.

Flare For the Obvious

Beltane                                                                           Emergence Moon

File under duh:

BOSTON — The death rate in Massachusetts dropped significantly after it adopted mandatory health care coverage in 2006, a study released Monday found, offering evidence that the country’s first experiment with universal coverage — and the model for crucial parts of President Obama’s health care law — has saved lives, health economists say.

The Young Guns

Spring                                                           Bee Hiving Moon

The America Votes meeting was very interesting with lots of good, solid data.  With the exception of two gray-haired guys in their late 50’s/early 60’s, I had a good 30 years + on everyone in the room.  It’s good to see the young guns at the table.  About evenly split between men and women they dressed somewhere between Minnesota casual and hipster. I fit right in.

It felt good to be there, to hear, consider, analyze, to wonder about the upcoming rounds of primaries and conventions, the long summer of positioning and the hard campaigning to come in the fall.

 

X

Spring                                                                      Bee Hiving Moon

Seeing the play the Mountaintop turned me toward a book I bought a while back,  “Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention.”  Marable was a Columbia University professor of public affairs and African-American studies until his death in 2011 just days before the book’s publication.  He got interested in Malcolm because the book that made him well-known, the Autobiography of Malcolm X, a joint work with Alex Haley, the “Roots” author, seemed to have a lot of lacunae.

It turns out Haley was a liberal Republican and had an agenda, present Malcolm as a critic of racial affairs that his peers could listen to.  Malcolm apparently agreed to the limited scope of the book’s treatment because the parts that were left out often made him look bad, or different from his own mythology.  Example.  His criminal past wasn’t nearly as thuggish as he represented, but merely amateurish.  He and Haley also left out much of Malcolm’s community organizing efforts.

Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention
By Manning Marable
Hardcover, 608 pages
Viking Adult

So Marable spent years going over Malcolm’s life again, re-interviewing and interviewing people in his life, reading his correspondence, much of it lovingly copied and photocopied by the FBI for inclusion in Malcolm’s voluminous file.  His writing is clear, his presentation straightforward if a little bloodless.  He has so much data that it threatens to and often does overwhelm the flesh and blood man whose story is its focus.

I like it a lot.  Malcolm always seemed to have a better analysis of racism and class issues than MLK did.  In this book his deep roots in the Marcus Garvey movement, his mother and father were both organizers for Garvey, and his incredible self-education while in prison for a string of burglaries, show a man hungry to understand himself and the world around him.  He organized working class blacks, knew the life of the criminal underclass as a participant and appreciated the iron power of white dominance.

Malcolm’s eventual conversion to orthodox Islam comes much further into the book than I am now, but his story has already shown me the cyclical patterns of race relations in this country and that King’s achievements, while notable, were the children of earlier and often more radical movements.

Well worth the time.

 

Beware The Ides of April

Spring                                                                   Bee Hiving Moon

15 degrees this morning.  Woolly Charlie Haislet who lives on Sims Lake near Gordon, Wisconsin reports 1 degree and 8-12 inches of snow on the way.  They have 2 feet of ice on the lake.

Beware the ides of April.  Libertarians and certain anti-tax right-wingers (we know who you are tea partiers) ventilate today.  Can you hear the sighs and moans of U.S. citizens forced to chip in for such things as roads, environmental protection, defense, national criminal justice systems, national science and health programs, healthcare programs, national weather services, Congress (well, o.k., Congress is a tough sell right now, but we can still vote the bums out), regulatory authorities?

Just how a complex citizenry, divided up among 50 states, and working in the world’s largest economy would function without national level efforts puzzles me.  But the fevered imagination of those who took the Reagan era’s “starve the beast” rhetoric seriously sees totally free agents doing anything they want personally and economically and being better off for it. At least the anarchists have the underlying idea of co-operation as a value for a functioning community.  The libertarian and tea-party folk apparently believe in a Hobbesian “all against all” and yearn for it.  Picture me scratching my head.

Freedom, by itself, is pointless.  Yes, I said that.  Freedom alone only allows room to act.  It does not, in itself, guide action unless, of course, it is freedom itself that is denied.  Given the paradox that absolute, unfettered freedom would produce its enemies: totalitarianism, constant criminality, or a forever war; then, we have to consider the limited freedom that makes modern civilization possible.  Even within the limits on freedom represented by taxes, speed limits, criminal law and regulation, the opportunity to develop yourself and your family as rapidly and as thoroughly as you wish, exists.

 

 

Mountaintop

Spring                                                              Bee Hiving Moon

 

Back from the Guthrie and the Penumbra presentation of Mountaintop, a play focused on Martin Luther King’s last night alive in the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee.  As it neared the end, it picked up emotional punch using a clever device that I won’t reveal. The pathos of a man about to die because he stood up for love, for justice, can sound wooden on the page, but to see a real man struggling with acceptance, to hear a real woman empathize with him, that’s different.  That’s the power of theatre.

There’s a good metaphor used in it, one you may have heard before, but which was new to me.  The civil rights movement, the movement for the poor is not a sprint, but a relay race, with one generation handing on the baton to the next.

When we discussed this play briefly at Christos on Monday, I made the observation that when our generation dies out, the generation who experienced King, Malcom and that whole era will die out, too.  That means these characters will pass into history, become captive to interpretation and canonization.  A certain amount of that has happened already.

That will be a shame because those years, the 60’s and early 70’s, were so alive and vital. The air crackled with change, with big questions, with thoughts of matters far beyond the vocational worth of a college diploma.  And we lived it.  It is our direct heritage and I like very much the notion of the baton.

I’m in that part of the race now where the baton is stretched out ahead of me, ready to lay in the hands of another, but my race is not yet run.  I’m accelerating, to keep the team ahead.

 

Wish I’d Known the Son-of-a-Bitch Wanted to be a Millionaire.

Spring                                                                      Bee Hiving Moon

Kate and I saw Nebraska the other night.  This movie was pitch perfect for heartland small town dialogue.  The images it created of Billings, Montana, Hawthorne, Nebraska,  and Lincoln, Nebraska felt taken from my recent adventure driving between my surprise incursion point into Kansas and Highway 80 in mid-Nebraska.  Small rural towns in the midwest have suffered, a lot, over the last 50 years.  They’re run down and often sparsely settled though that trend has begun to ameliorate somewhat.

There were as well images of striking beauty, especially a wide-angle shot of a slightly rolling field with bales of rolled hay sprinkled throughout.  If not for the black and white, it could have been painted by Breughel.  The big sky and vast horizons of the drive from Billings to Lincoln are also beautiful, the stark aesthetic of the plains.

Not only because it was black and white, but because of its tight focus on family and strangeness (remember Mom lifting her skirt to the gravestone?), too, this film reminded me of Ingmar Bergman.  These were everyman characters dealing with everyday issues:  a desultory  job, American hucksterism and its unwitting victims, a long distanced father and son closing the gap, a slow revelation of Woody and David’s largeheartedness.

It will, unfortunately, only serve to convince bi-coastal sophisticates that the rural midwest is unredeemable, shabby and coarse, low-browed.  It cannot and does not try to show the agricultural culture that lies behind the small towns and cities and lives it portrays.  It also cannot show the slow but persistent erosion of rural life as farming has gone corporate and the kids leave home for Chicago, Minneapolis, Denver, even Lincoln and Omaha.

This is not a criticism of the movie, but a wistful longing for an artful representation of growing food, tending livestock, some way of showing the heartland as just that, the heart of a great nation and a food producer for the world.