24 Years and Still in Love

Imbolc                                                      Hare Moon

Sometimes, not often, but sometimes an event matches its purpose.  Tonight’s anniversary dinner was such an event.  We arrived at the Nicollet Island Inn at 6 pm, the same place exterior-nightwhere, 24 years ago, we spent the night before boarding a PanAm (yes, PanAm, can you imagine?) flight for Rome.

The host knew it was our anniversary, took us to our table after complimenting us on our glasses and our colorful garments and pointed to the bouquet on the table.  “You are loved,” he said to Kate. “24 years and still in love?”  Yes, we nodded.  “Wonderful.  Have a great evening.”  We did.

We thanked our taste in classical music, our seats at the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra for 72KateandmePizarro2011 11 01_3529bringing us together.  We looked at the things that could have gone badly like Kate earning a lot and me earning much less, then nothing.  I said, “I think the thing we’ve done, all along, is nurture the best in each other. I don’t see how you can ask for more in a relationship.”  Kate agreed. Somehow we have seen the highest and best in each other, staying out of each other’s way in some instances, stepping in with a helping hand at others.

(in Pizarro’s dining room, Lima, Peru)

Kate ordered the scallops; I went for the tenderloin.  We both ate less than half, saving some for tomorrow.  I set aside my low carb focus to have a chocolate tart for dessert. We finished smiling.  Kate slid over and put her arm through mine.

Added to the bill were two Nicollet Island Inn mugs, memories of the evening of our 24th.

Next year in Hawai’i!

mamasHeader2

24

Imbolc                                                                      Hare Moon

Nicollet Island Inn tonight for our 24th anniversary dinner.

Marriage is an interesting institution and not an obvious one.  There is certainly no need IMAG0331for marriage as a means of assuring reproduction.  There is ample evidence that monogamy grinds against some people all of the time and most people some of the time. The notion of finding someone in your twenties with whom you will be compatible in your sixties is almost laughably difficult.  Of course, that problem can be solved.  First, a divorce.  Second, capitulation.  Third, growing along with each other.

I’ve done the first, would find the second constitutionally impossible and now, thankfully, have ample evidence that the third is an option, too.  Even marrying in our forties, as Kate and I did, doesn’t necessarily augur well for life together in old age.  Why not?  Well, forty somethings getting married are still in their working years, burdened and shaped by the demands of occupation and vocation.

After the work life recedes, there’s no guarantee that the two will still want to see each other across the breakfast and lunch and dinner table.

Kate and I have made this transition over the last couple of years, integrating our lives in a IMAG0531more closely choreographed dance.  Now, when I work here in my study, her sewing machine whirs above me, her feet move across the floor from table to ironing board as she works on her current project.  When we look at travel opportunities, we can be much more flexible in our decisions.  As the growing season unfolds, so will another year of mutual garden work, growing food, caring for the bees.

We didn’t know we’d be good at this when we got married.  It wasn’t on our minds.  But that third option, the growing together one?  It’s marked every step along the pilgrimage of our life together, a pilgrimage far from finished.

Where Will the Dead-to-Work Live?

Imbolc                                                                  Hare Moon

Realized the other day that I’m going to be driving to Arizona in late March.  At 67 that makes me a cliche, the stereotypical white-haired escapee from the frozen lands of the north.  I worked for a while at Unity-Unitarian Church in St. Paul.  Roy Phillips, senior minister there for 23 years, always referred to Minnesota as the frozen tundra.  His last church was in Tucson.

(Sun City Florida ad image)

In 1960 developer Del Webb opened the first homes in what would become Sun City.  Sun City soon became a byword for retirement Valhalla, a place where the worthy dead-to-the-work-world could gather and each day play 18 holes.  After golf they could climb in the cart and drive home to a feast celebrating having crossed work’s finish line.

Sun City was nothing more than a name and a cultural symbol to me when I married Kate. Her parents, though, had retired there, so I had more than one opportunity to see it from the resident’s perspective.  The first time we visited the flat, uniform plats stood out, small single level homes interspersed with golf courses, tennis courts and services like churches, funeral homes and a recreational center.  The colors were muted, desert pastels and the streets eerily quiet.  The ubiquitous golf carts with their electric motors made little noise and there were few of those in sight. (Sun City Florida ad image)

The longer I was around Sun City the more aberrant it seemed to me.  With a minimum age of 55 there were no children.  No young families.  No teenagers.  This was seen as a blessing by many, maybe most who lived there, but it did something odd to the character of the place.

It meant your friends and neighbors were all old.  Dinner table conversation often turned to deaths and illness, frailty.  There was no future there.  Only death.  After that, the desert.  Sun City felt hermetically sealed off from the ongoing world, a sort of vestibule for the life hereafter; when it was meant to be, I think, the life hereafter work.

A rarely mentioned but frequently experienced dilemma occasioned by this flight to Arizona was absent family.  In this case it wasn’t the kids who had moved away from home, following work or a spouse, but the parents.  At first, I imagine, it was exhilarating, all the time with no kids, no grandkids.  No birthdays and holidays, no Thanksgiving.  Free at last.

But when the inevitable decline set in, then the anguished calls would go out.  And they went out to children in Minneapolis, in Boston, in New York.  Sons and daughters had to do long distance elder care while Mom and Dad suffered and sometimes died alone.

Whether those more carefree years of early retirement balanced out the difficulties of the latter years differs from person to person, of course.  But I know in the case of Kate’s parents, both of them, their final illnesses were difficult on all parties, a difficulty not only exacerbated by distance, but also created by it.

These early emigres to Sun City were experimenters, pioneers of the new model for healthy life after the end of work.  But the lessons that could have been learned, I’m afraid were not.

Just visit the Del Webb site for proof that this kind of elder dispersal continues to this day.

Communities need their older citizens, for memory, for continuity, for child rearing, for role modeling, for what has been learned.  Age graded communities deprive both the old and the young of necessary interaction.  Life with children is life with a future; life without them is a sterile desert.  Likewise for children life without older neighbors and grandparents is life without a living link to the past.

I feel this keenly because Kate and I are here in Minnesota with our children and grandchildren far away.  To magnify that our nuclear and extended families are also far away.  This is not a complaint, we’ve made our choices and they have made theirs, but the net effect is for us to be in our mini-Sun City, an aging exurban development with no children. Strange when I look at it that way, but it’s true.