Category Archives: Art and Culture

Photocentrism

Fall                                              New (Harvest) Moon

OK,I made this up.  Photocentrism is a focus on the virtue of light that, by implication, puts darkness in a negative or bad relative position.  Just because I made it up, however, does not mean I’m joking.  The context:  the docent annual meeting today and the presentation of a new December of the month called Winterlights.  I agree that Winterlights is a complex noun that has a rich associative feel.  I even agree that the celebrations in what I have long called holiseason–Thanksgiving to January 6th, the traditional 12th day of Christmas, Epiphany (visit of the Magi to Bethlehem), and the date for the celebration of Christmas in the Eastern Church–offer an unparalleled opportunity to learn from other cultures about matters deep in the human psyche:  Thanksgiving, Advent, Deepavali, Hanukkah, Posada, Winter Solstice/Yule, Christmas, Western New Year on January 1, the 12 days of Christmas and maybe Kwaansa, though its constructed nature makes me a bit shy of it.  Eid al Adha, the Muslim holiday that marks the end of Hajj by celebrating the Irbrahim and Ishmael story, falls in November this year, but not within holiseason itself, so I’m going to leave it out of this discussion.

The festivals or holidays of light, in particular Deepavali, Hanukkah, Winter Solstice (although is a special case as we shall see) and Christmas (more for what it replaces, Saturnalia, than what it celebrates itself) do have a common thread.  Deepavali, Winter Solstice and Christmas all relate to the despair felt in subsistence agriculture communities when the light of the sun seemed as if it would wink out and perhaps disappear altogether.  This fear, of the Sun’s final rising, put its mark on well-known pre-historical landmarks like Stonehenge, Chichen-Itza and the great Newgrange dolmen in Ireland.  Without a knowledge of the physics and celestial mechanics of the earth’s orbit and the sun’s central place in our solar system, it was frightening to consider the possibility that this time, this winter, the gradual diminishment of daylight might proceed all the way to an apocalyptic darkness.  No light for the crops.  No crops for the animals.  Cold all the time.

What to do?  According to theories of sympathetic magic, like produces like, so the logical response to oncoming darkness was a bonfire, a torch, a brave manifestation of light and heat in hopes that the sun, since it is like light and heat, will either be rekindled or seduced into rising again.  And these practices work.  Each time the bonfires were lit, the torches paraded, the sun did not disappear, but returned to once again start the growing season and stave off starvation and freezing for another year.

All of this makes sense, granting the scientific understandings of these early peoples.  As cultures grew more sophisticated and astronomical knowledge became a bit more advanced, however, it did put out the lingering fear that the darkness would one day come and never leave.  So holidays that focused on light, especially, but fire, too, became integral parts of the cultural and religious traditions of many peoples.

They all leave out one important thing, though.  The virtues of darkness.  I first became aware of the following arguments when I began to research the goddess, the great mother goddess.  I won’t get into here the debate surrounding the contention by some that a great mother goddess preceded the monotheistic, patriarchal deities of the Abrahamic religions, though I’ll tip my hand enough to say that I don’t find the evidence compelling.

What I found out about darkness surprised me and changed my mind about how I view it.  Darkness is as necessary as light.  Seeds start growing in the dark soil, away from light and even after they penetrate the surface, their roots continue to press their way into the surrounding nutrient-filled earth.  Mammal babies live their first few months of life in the moist, nourishment rich environment of their mother’s womb. (OK, not in the marsupials and the platypus and the echidna’s instance, but you get the drift.)  Darkness creates the time of rest and restoration for us and for many animals.  It is when we sleep and when we dream.  Darkness is the natural condition of space, attenuated by billions of stars only in what amounts to a small total area of the vastness of the universe.  Light itself requires a degree of darkness to create vision.  Anyone who’s ever been in a whiteout where snow and sky mix to create a vertiginous world with no up and down, no distinguishing characteristics understands the problem well.  Or consider a bright, very bright light and its affect on your sight.

This argument can be cast as a feminist one in which the light represents patriarchy and the darkness the creative agency of women.  It can also relate to anti-racism work in that we tend to equate darkness, blackness with evil, with corruption and decay.  This denies the regenerative, restorative and generative nature of darkness and narrows our conceptual world in literally dangerous ways.

How could this relate to Winterlights?  Without this kind of background the celebration of light has a sinister side as well its assumed positive one.  The celebrations of light only make sense in terms of the deep cultural background and when we go there we need to understand the fear that created these holidays has also unbalanced our appreciation of the other state, darkness.  I’ve not given it any thought, but I imagine there works of art that make darkness a central theme, that could be used to help put the other holidays in a balanced perspective.

Hanukkah is a special case here in which the focus does not seem to be on the Winter Solstice but on a cultural achievement by the Maccabees, the expelling of the Greeks.  It does however beautiful-darknessshare a darkness dispelling theme with the others.

There is more to say here, much more, but I’m hungry.  Catch you later.

A Baroque Morning

Fall                                 Waning Back to School Moon

Down to Ada’s Deli this am for fried matzo and egg with onions and lox.  My mystery guest (Kate’s retirement gift) told me her kids loved fried matzo with syrup.  Hmm…not with lox and onions for this gentile.

We had a spirited hour long discussion.  Very high energy, Deb is.  Her fiance deals in the secondary metals market, aluminum.  She’s in favor of retirement, wants to travel with her new love.  She used to live in Hyde Park and brightened when I said we could have met at Jimmie’s.  Gonna be good, I know for sure.

When we finished, I walked out on Wabash to Washington.  Orthodox Jewish men here with black satchels.  Jeweler’s Row.  Up Washington to Michigan Avenue, south a block of Michigan and over to the Art Institute.  Great weather and I considered just heading into Grant Park, but the Institute was right there.

Wandered in the European Art before 1900, finding many Baroque paintings, some wonderful Renaissance works, too.  Overall, our collection compares well, not in quantity but in quality.  Baroque is a propaganda art form like Socialist Realism; the Roman Catholic church wanted to counter the rising tide of the Protestant Reformation.  One branch of that counter reformation effort emphasized images that spoke of particularly Catholic themes, at least as the Catholic church saw it:  forgiveness, assumption of Mary, saints, crucifixion scenes.

They were lucky that some of the very best painters in the Western tradition came to the task with energy and invention.  Many well known names were Baroque painters:  Vermeer, Rembrandt, Caravaggio, Poussin, Rubens and Vermeer.

The Baroque painters select the climactic moment to depict. They use rich, deep colors, often lots of shadow. wanting to arouse emotion, a commitment of faith in the religious insistence.

Religious painting does not exhaust Baroque themes, however.  Our own Lucretia by Rembrandt is a Baroque work that features a historical them from Roman history.

These are wonderful paintings, romantic in a sense, calling the viewer to participate, to feel, to decide.  Glad I had the chance to see more examples here in Chicago.

Chicken Pot Pies and Memories

Fall                                                 Waning Back to School Moon

Before the Vikings game on Sunday I made two chicken pot pies, whole pies filled with chicken, vegetables and a thickened vegetable broth made in the process.  These are my second and third meat pies and I find I enjoy making them as much as I do soup.  Something about baking a pie that has meat and vegetables intrigues me.  This one had our leeks, potatoes, onions, carrots, garlic, parsley and thyme.  My favorite vegetable from this garden is the leek.  The subtle flavor and the delicate flesh of the leek both appeal to my palate.

Here are a few of the ingredients plus a tomato and raspberries from our garden.  This potato looks similar to the woman of la mouthe in the MIA’s collection.  At least to my eye.670_0300 Fresh ingredients are key to Italian, Chinese and vegetarian cooking so a garden facilitates those cuisines, at least during the harvest system.  Our best meals of the summer happen in September.

Visiting Westminster today brought up all kinds of memories.  Don Meisel, former head pastor, came into the men’s room once during a Presbytery meeting.  I had a report on top of the urinal, reading it.  Don said, “My, you must get a lot of work done.”  Presbyterian humor. Another surprising Don Meisel moment.  There on the wall of a hallway was the exact same Granlund sculpture, the Tree of Life, that I bought Kate for her 50th birthday.  Don had given it to the church in memory of his wife.

Jim Campbell’s name came up, too.  Jim was a top exec of Northwest Bank and a leader on the Community Involvement Program’s board.  I worked at CIP for 4+ years, starting as a janitor and week-end staff person during seminary and moving up to Director of Residential programs.  Jim came to me at one point and asked if I would take on directing both the Residential programs and the Day Activity Centers.  I thought about it and said no.  That surprised him, I could tell.  It surprised me a bit, too.  I had no interest then or later in advancement, even though I did end up as an Associate Executive Presbyter.

Then, the chapel.  What a peaceful space,  a definite English feel to it wood, limestone, slate floor, a beautiful organ.  Wilson Yates, then professor of society and religion at United Seminary, married Raeone and me in that chapel in 1979.  Ed Berryman, the organist, refused to play the music we wanted.  I don’t remember what it was.  We had Handel’s Water Music.  Ed liked it.

There were, too, many mornings of bible study with urban clergy in the now much renovated basement area.  Bible study was always one of the fun parts because Presbyterian clergy pride themselves on their scholarly ability.

Well, off to bed.  Gotta catch the Empire Builder at 7:30 am.

Global Wealth in our Gilded Age: Conclusion

Fall                                                        Waning Back to School Moon

David Little has blown into town with contemporary photography and new media at his back.  His energy gives a new breadth and depth to the photography collection.

Embarrassment of Riches demonstrates both.  He recalls seeing an Annie Leibovitz photograph, an advertisement.  Mikhail Gorbachev sits in the back of an expensive car, his hand somewhat anxiously on the door handle, looking at the Berlin Wall.  Sitting on the seat next to him is a Louis Vuitton bag.  The image exploded.  What would be the equivalent, if say the USSR had won the cold war, Ronald Reagan in a Soviet limo with a gold hammer and sickle sitting next to him, perhaps looking at the same wall from the other side?

The global reach of capitalism and the vastly increased wealth around the world had wrought an unimaginable change in an icon of our former blood enemy.  Was this how global wealth looked?  In an investigation into how photographers portray wealth and its cultural influence, Little made an interesting discovery.  Documentary photography had focused on the poor, those without wealth, and also without the power and perhaps the understanding to control their own images.  Photographers could access the despairing mother of the depression era, the projects of Chicago’s southside, the barrios of Latin America but the wealthy knew had to handle the paparazzi.  Deny them access.

Imaging wealth had a taboo feel, but wealth at unprecedented levels must have resulted in some images.  Where were they?  He knew some of them already, but had to search for others, especially others that dealt with wealth from an objective perspective, neither glorifying or chastising.  This show, which takes its name from a Simon Schama book of the same name, aims to show that other side of life, the life of those with power and money, but to show it in situ.

A traditional problem of photography, of art in general, lies in how to show the invisible, then how to do it and not be obvious, heavy handed.  The photographs in the currency section of the show wrestle with that problem and have several different answers.  Gleaming oil pipelines, stacks of gold bullion, an uber power lunch, a stock exchange, an inventory of lamps all suggest rather than tell, reveal yet also conceal.  They are not didactic, at least not in any propagandistic way.  Value, critical to each image, is ephemeral and socially determined whether by Arab men selling stocks and oil futures or the market for gold or the power carried by top level business leaders gathered in one room.

Art, too, is a currency of sorts.  It has a market, is sold in galleries and at auction and through private transactions.  Curiously, though, it has no intrinsic value, lumps of marble, paint on canvas, ink on paper, images on photo paper.  The value of art is purely transactional.  So, in this sense, each of the photographs in this exhibition participate in the thing they depict, especially since the world of art tends to be the world of the rich and powerful.

This exhibit is as much about photography and photography as art as it about the contents of the images in it, more so because the images show only a minuscule slice of the lives of the rich and powerful.  So the title Embarrassment of Riches carries at least a double meaning, it describes what the images contain, but it also describes the images as art.  Worth seeing.

Global Wealth in our Gilded Age: Rituals and Style

Fall                                                   Waning Back to School Moon

Rituals and Style

In a clever twist on two Alex Prager images, the first an upper class family in their opulent home, posed as if to reveal joints in a (dysfunctional?) family system and the second a wood-paneled room stuffed with paintings and sculpture and orchids which has an elderly man sitting and a younger man holding a dog standing with his hand on the others shoulder, Alec Soth has shot an understated, by comparison to the other two hanging next to it, interior.  Seated in the position of prominence however is not a prim, confident daughter or a posed son or lover, but Moujik IV, a French bulldog owned by Yves Saint Laurent.  Moujik IV, which means Russian peasant, is the last of four French bulldogs owned by the fashion designer and heir to a considerable fortune of his own.  His bodyguard stands off to the side.  Laurent, if told a country would not accept Moujik, refused to go.

All three of these images, which occupy a niche near the end of the exhibit, let us peak behind the gates or doorman guarded lobbies of wealthy homes.   We see their inhabitants, both canine and human, in their environments, but posed as part of a documentation ritual of wealth’s domestic codes.

Cindy Sherman dolled up and posed before an Upper Eastside apartment building (see below) stands in the Rituals and Style section along yet another Abe Morrel piece, 34 million Swiss Francs, a portrait of colorful bundles of Swiss paper currency.

Martin Parr’s three photographs complete the exhibition.  All of his evoke in-crowd ritual events available only to those with cash or connections, or both.  The first is a cocktail party in Cambridge, England.  It shows only feet, shoes, the bottom of skirts and a martini glass all posed on a white rug.  The second shows an Arab man in traditional clothing looking at a pink stroller (very expensive according to David Little) tended by a woman in a pink hijab.  Next to the Arab man stands a rubinesque Arab woman in high heels and a tight fitting body suit.  This is the lobby at a polo match.  The final picture, which reminded me immediately of Rene Magritte, has five men in bowlers watching or preparing to watch the  Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe in Paris.

The concluding portion of this review will look at the overall implications of Embarrassment of Riches.

Global Wealth in our Gilded Age: Currency

Fall                                                  Waning Back to School Moon

David Little has Embarrassment of Riches divided into three sections:  Currency, Space, Rituals and Style.

Currency

Abe Morrel makes pictures of currency.  In Embarrassment of Riches he has two photographs, one of gold bars and the other of Swiss Francs.  The photograph at the right has this title:  39 Gold Bar: $15,372,742 (11 AM/GMT-3/13/08): $988.25/oz Zurich, Switzerland.  The full title is important because Morrel, who likes the materiality of currency, also comments on value.  As the title suggests, value has an ephemeral quality, pegged to an exact moment, uncertain and socially determined.  Yesterday gold reached a new all time high of $1,300 an ounce.  Allison suggested an interesting addition to this photo:  a digital readout of the price of gold as it fluctuates.

This ephemeral quality of value made me reconsider the meaning of currency.  Currency is just that, value at the current moment.

Also in the currency section is a beautiful and initially puzzling image.  Amidst a north woods setting, pine trees and a gray sky, a glittering metal abstraction snakes just along the forest border, extending as if to infinity along with the edge it defines.  What is it?  An oil pipeline carrying oil from northern Alberta.  Ironically, and I suspect unintentionally, this image meshes with a current Sierra Club initiative aimed at bringing awareness to the very high proportion of Minnesota’s oil supply that comes from the Alberta Tar Sands, an oil source that combines wilderness despoliation with climate changing fossil fuel emissions.

An inventory of lamps, members of the Kuwaiti stock exchange sitting in white robes on red leather couches arranged in conversational squares, two cars-a Ford and a Lexus with Chinese models draped sinuously over them and the Luc Delahaye image I talk about below complete the Currency section of the show.

With one exception.  A sock.  That’s right, a man’s sock, displayed on a podium under a plastic vitrine, draped as if just taken off and perhaps thrown on the floor.  How does this fit in the currency section?

Christian Jankowski works with video installation and performance art.  He is the artist behind the sock.  In Embarrassment, in the Rituals and Style section, a Jankowksi piece called, Strip the Auctioneer, shows over and over again.  It features a genuine Christie’s auctioneer, videotaped by Jankowski in the process of selling first his pocket handkerchief, then his suit coat, a shirt, two shoes and two, wait for it, socks!  The auction was a benefit for an arts school, so the bidding was genuine.

David says he doesn’t know whether it is the right sock or the left.  It makes a difference in terms of value:  the right sock sold for $3,047 and the left for $3,324.  Of rituals associated with the life of wealth, an auction at Christies or Sothebys must be close to the top, perhaps after certain prestigious horse races.  Oh, by the way, this photograph shows the auctioneer offering the final item for sale in Jankowski’s piece, the hammer.

Photography as Art

Fall (Mabon)                                           Full Back to School Moon

Into the Sierra Club to orient a new member of the Legislative Committee.  After that, a couple of hours in the new photo exhibit, Embarrassment of Riches.  The new photography curator, David Little, has pushed forward a contemporary approach to the photography and new media department.  He’s showing color photographs, unusual against the Hartwell years of classic black and white photography.  David also has an edgy, political sensibility that insists on embracing difficult questions contemporary photography either raises or documents.  Works for me.

Ate lunch at D’Amico’s and Kwo showed up.  We discussed China and its pluriform culture, especially important as we consider its rise today in the context of other Asian countries that seem to have much more homogeneous cultures:  Japan, Korea, Vietnam, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Burma.  Kwo believes Confucianism and its insistence on obedience to authority has affected especially Japan and Korea, shaping their society into a perfect environment for xenophobia.

After lunch David Little gave the lecture and walk through of Embarrassment.

He began the lecture responding to a question about whether he posted information about photographs that had been photoshopped.  He does not.  His reasons reveal a good deal about contemporary photography and some of the challenges it faces.  Photography has had, David says, an obsession with technology, an obsession that has seemed to place the technical aspects of photography in the foreground.  A focus on how a photography makes a given image detracts from emphasis on the image itself, a distraction that embedded a question about photography as art within the very art historical conversation.

Do you know Degas’ paint brush?  How Goya mixed his paints and what elements he used?  Any clue about the canvas on that Rembrandt?  We do not focus first on technique and implements in the art history of other objects like painting and sculpture.  Why?  Because the image or the physical object produced commands our attention.  David suggests that the same is true of photographs, the images created by photographers.

Just as painters have long emphasized those parts of a scene that make it look beautiful, harmonious, so do photographers use various techniques to make the final image have a certain look.  Portraitists often create an image of a sitter that is not a mere copy or likeness, rather they highlight some aspects and downplay others to reveal a personality.  Photographers, as artists, have the same latitude in shaping their work.

Photoshop is only one in a long line of manipulations photographers have used.  There never has been a “straight” photograph, the real image before manipulation.  Choice of light, focus, shutter speed, subject matter manipulates the image in the camera itself.  Dark room manipulations have gone on since the development of emulsions.  David does not want to create a hierarchy of photographs in which one is more “real” and therefore a “better” image.

 

This image by and of Cindy Sherman is in the exhibition.  It uses a projected building facade from somewhere on the upper eastside of New York and over it Sherman has imposed one of her signature personal images.  She dresses up as many different characters in her work, this time appearing as an art patron in the coded dress of her social class.  Its creation is not the point; the point is the result, a softly satirical presentation of a type of a New Yorker.  There is no real image to find that is behind this one.  This seems evident to me in this case.

David Little’s point is that each photograph we see in the exhibition deserves the same treatment.

Moving From the Theoretical to the Concrete

Lughnasa                                            Waxing Back to School Moon

Kate has had a nasty cold since Monday and I can feel it trying to claw its way up my esophagus, making my throat scratchy.  My hope is that the recent two time bout I had with some bug in July, then August has revved up my immune system.  With rest I can pound this sucker down before it takes hold.

Starting back on Latin today.  I took part of July, all of August and the last couple of weeks off with the bees and the vegetables and the orchard.  Thought I’d get work done on Ovid, review, but in fact I got very little done.  An old student habit of mine, if it’s not pressing, it’s not getting done.  I’m looking forward to the weekly sessions, building toward enough confidence to tackle Ovid and others on my own.  It’s a project, like the bees, that keeps the gears turning, not giving them a chance to rest.  Best that way.

A few years back it was the MIA docent training.  Then the move into permaculture and vegetables and fruit.  That one’s still underway as I learn the complicated dance of seasons, cultivars, pests, harvest and storage.  The MIA training, for that matter, only gives you enough legs to get into the books and files yourself, training you to look and think about art, but each tour demands specific self-education on the objects and the purpose of that tour.

(Minoan Gold Bee pendant from Crete, circa 2000 BC)

Part of my impatience with the seminary experience is that I’ve moved so deeply into more concrete endeavors.  Art has the object as an anchor, then its history and context.  Latin has words, grammar and literature as well as Roman history.  Vegetables and fruit have real plants, particular plants with needs and products.  The bees have the bees themselves, the colonies, woodenware, hive management, pest control, honey extraction.  This is, probably, the world I was meant to inhabit, but philosophy and the church lead onto another ancientrail, that of the abstract and faraway rather than the particular and the near.  It’s not that I don’t have an affection, even a passion for the theoretical, I do, but I find my life more calm, less stressful when I work with art, with potatoes and garlic, with conjugations and declensions.

I now have almost three decades of life devoted to the theoretical, the abstract and the political so I bring those skills and that learning to my present engagement with the mundane, but I no longer want to live in those worlds.  They are gardens others can tend better than I can.

This Time, I Moved the Art.

Lughnasa                                  Waxing Back to School Moon

A bit bleary eyed this morning, I ate breakfast, drank some Awake tea and stumbled out the door without my glasses.  I was on my to the U-Haul store to rent a truck, a whole truck to carry one painting.  Jeremiah Miller, my brother-in-law, married to Kate’s sister Sarah, painted it.  Kate bought two of his works quite a while ago.  He’s an accomplished landscape painter living in North Carolina who exhibits and sells mostly in the South East.

His works are usually big, the one I needed the truck to move measures 5′ 10″ by 5′ 10″.  Here’s an example of a recent work for sale on his website:

We put a four inch slice in it while moving it from one room to another.  It had to go into the art doctor, the Midwest Art Conservation Center.  After securing it with a roll of landscaping cloth and a Cuties tangerine box, just the right amount of pressure to keep it flat and in place, I drove it into the MIA where the MACC has space in the basement of the new Target wing.

Loading Dock B has big folding doors, installed to mollify angry neighbors who complained about truck exhaust polluting their neighborhood.  They open up, like the jaws of a leviathan, inviting you in, then closing on you after you park.

At that point a guard comes up and wonders what the heck a u-haul truck is doing in the museum’s dock area.  I explain that Jonathan expects me.  She nods and calls.  Yes, he was.

Jonathan came up and helped me carry the painting up the stairs and onto the MACC’s shiny elevator. This is a very new wing.  We whirred downstairs one floor below ground level and carried the painting out of the elevator and into the painting conservation room, a room I had visited while on a tour about a year ago.  This time it was one of our paintings that would be tended to the by careful ministrations of the conservators.

Art conservation is a rarified world inhabited by people who have both a fondness and talent for fine art and an interest and skill in chemistry and materials management.  Paintings are not the only objects conserved.  The MACC handles conservation work for the Upper Midwest, covering many museums, its usual patrons, and the occasional job for private art owners.  Sculpture and frames constitutes another department, textiles another and works on paper yet another.  Each of these departments has its specialists who know how to remove paint one flake at a time, how to resew a moth eaten tapestry or restore life to an ukiyo-e print damaged by scotch tape.

The process requires a 100 dollar examination fee.  The result of this work is a condition report and a treatment proposal.  We’ll receive ours in one to two weeks.

I drove the truck back to the U-haul store.  I had estimated, off the top of my head, that the trip would require 50 miles.  I went 51.  Not bad.

Sitting Back

Lughnasa                                       Waning  Artemis Moon

The big push on honey extraction, preceded by the push to mulch the orchard and the vegetable garden, has left both Kate and me happy the weather has soured.  She sews, now in the room right above my study, and I tap tap tap away following this lead and that down the cyber rabbit hole.

After reading Romance of the Three Kingdoms and Blind Descent, I’ve veered off into fiction, a sort of relief has taken my reading and I’ve plowed through 2 1/2 novels this last week +.  None of it so far is noteworthy, just pleasant diversions.

Worked this last week on a project for the office of Learning and Innovation at the Museum.  It involved responding to a new exhibition of heads and masks to be installed in the hallway in front of the antiquities galleries.  It’s part of the Art Remix concept.  Thinking in this way, finding connections between the new installation and other parts of the museum, stimulated me, shot off a spark or two.